Cell therapy clinical trials in 2011

by Alexey Bersenev on January 4, 2012 · 10 comments

in clinical trials and cases

Post to Twitter

In April 2011 I’ve started a new project – Cell Therapy Trials. This is a prototype for tracking of clinical trials and cases in cell therapy field with publicizing it via Twitter. The big part of the project is collection of clinical data via tracking of published literature, conference reports and business press-releases. Today I’d like to share with you some results of this project – tracking of registered clinical trials in 2011.

Data collection criteria
I tracked clinical trials which fall in definition of cell therapy: administration living cells in human with therapeutic purpose. I included tissue engineering and excluded devices for cell processing. I tracked all clinical trials which were registered in 2011 in international databases.

“Registered” doesn’t necessarily mean “new”. Some trials were registered in late phases (2/3 or 3) or listed as completed. Because trials, registered in late stages consist only ~ 3.7%, I include all of them in the analysis. The vast majority of trials (>95%), registered in 2011, were in early stages (1-1/2-2). I called these trials “new”. The status of the most “new” trials was “recruiting” or “not open yet” (just launched). I think, it reflects real situation in cell therapy activity around the world.

I collected data about all cell therapy trials, excluding hematopoietic stem/ progenitor cells for homologous use (hematology – oncology). This approach allows to get a sense about activity in cellular immunotherapy and regenerative medicine.

Data access
I input raw data in spreadsheet. The data include: trial id, hyperlink to trial, country, phase, status, condition, cell type, allogeneic/ autologous, academic/ industry-sponsored. This document is publicly available. Everyone can use and play with these data!

Number of trials: I was able to track 151 trials.

Databases scanned:
US NCT (NIH-FDA)
German DRKS
Japanese JPRN
Indian CTRI
Chinese ChiTCR
Australian/NZ ANZCTR
ISRCTN
Dutch NTR
South Korean CRIS

Worldwide activity:

Monetary support:
I roughly divide all trials on 2 categories – “academic” and “industry”. The term “academic” combined any monetary support (governments, funds…) other than “company-sponsored” (“industry”).

Cell types:
I was able to identify roughly 25 different cell types used in clinical trials. I roughly divide them on “stem” and “non-stem”. “Stem” cell types included: embryonic stem cells, multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, hematopoietic stem/ progenitor cells, cardiac stem/ progenitor cells, neural stem cells, CD133+ cells.


Abbreviations: ESC – embryonic stem cells, MSC – multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, HSPC – hematopoietic stem/ progenitor cells, TIL – tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, DC – dendritic cells, BM – bone marrow, MNC – mononuclear cells, NK – natural killer cells, CIK – cytokine-induced killers, SC – stem cells.

Indications:

Future development:

  • trends identification
  • analysis of trials outcome via published results
  • collaboration and data representation

Source: @CellTrials

How to cite: Bersenev Alexey. Cell therapy clinical trials in 2011. Hematopoiesis blog. January 3, 2011. Available: http://hematopoiesis.info/2012/01/04/cell-therapy-trials-2011

Related posts:

  1. Tracking of clinical trials and cases in cell therapy and regenerative medicine
  2. Roadblocks for cell therapy clinical trials
  3. Cell therapy clinical trials 2009 – part IV
  4. Cell therapy clinical trials 2009 – part II
  5. Cell therapy clinical trials 2009 – part I

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Jon Rowley January 5, 2012 at 1:04 am

Alexey

This is great. An extremely useful resource for the community. Keep up the great job supporting the Cell Therapy community!

Best from Maryland

Jon Rowley

Reply

Sandy Kuligowski January 5, 2012 at 1:35 am

Alexey,
This information is very interesting and helpful in understanding current status and trends in the Cell Therapy field globally. I will continue to follow your updates.

Thanks for collating and sharing this information.

Best Regards,

Sandy Kuligowski

Reply

Udaykumar January 7, 2012 at 4:32 pm

Excellent, very useful information. Thanks lot for collating and sharing the data.
Best
Uday

Reply

scott broughton January 9, 2012 at 3:37 pm

Alexy; Agreed. Nice job, very informative and helpful in seeing trends for the future and advancement of cell therapy

Reply

Mary McElroy January 19, 2012 at 3:52 pm

Alexy, many thanks for posting this research – very informative. Mary

Reply

Cliff Carroll February 1, 2012 at 3:56 pm

Alexey, This is a fantastic collection of information. The visualizations are additionally extremely informative, but providing the spreadsheet was almost too kind. Thanks for all of your hard work.

Reply

Marcos Levy February 3, 2012 at 12:09 pm

Alexey, great job, thanks for sharing
Regards

Reply

Claudia Zylberberg February 3, 2012 at 12:44 pm

Great piece of information, very well put together

Claudia

Reply

scott March 22, 2012 at 2:51 pm

Alexey. Great you are staying on top of this – really a full time job! No?
We are always trying to keep up with this and also in each trial, the number of patients. Some are small (10-20 safety), some are bigger (ongoing 50-100 patients) and larger commercial phase III (200 plus)… so we’ll share that with you at some point soon “as we see it”. Thanks… Scott

Reply

Aline M. Betancourt, PhD April 5, 2012 at 6:59 pm

Alexey–great timing I will include some of your cool pics in a review chapter I am writing for Springer. I will send you the info. when it gets published. Thanks for ALL you do for cell-based therapies! Best wishes, ali

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: